Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Cosmic blue and Crystal pink |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 14.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Moto G8 Plus, with a 92.3 score against 77.6. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little lighter and a lot thinner than Moto G8 Plus. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better screen than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a bit bigger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a little bit greater screen pixel density.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better processing unit than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto G8 Plus counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% greater battery size. Moto G8 Plus captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G8 Plus also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor, a bigger aperture and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.