Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is way better than Motorola Moto G8 Power's general score of 76. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Motorola Moto G8 Power were only released with a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is incredibly thinner and just a little lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version, giving some additional features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a little bigger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a just a little greater display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a greater memory for games and applications than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations and a way worse resolution camera, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Moto G8 Power has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than Moto G8 Power, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.