Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Moto G84, having a 92.3 score against 80.9. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Moto G84 has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Moto G84 counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per screen inch, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller display. Motorola Moto G84 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a way better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Motorola Moto G84's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 5G's one, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Moto G84 has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.