Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Moto G9 Play, having a overall score of 92.3 against 76.7. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Moto G9 Play has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features. Even when the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Moto G9 Play were released with only 1 months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is noticeably thinner and just a bit lighter.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a brighter display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a quite larger display, way more pixels per screen inch and a way better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G9 Play features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Moto G9 Play captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Moto G9 Play also has a lot larger camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments and a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.