Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the Moto G9 Power's overall score of 78.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Moto G9 Power were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much thinner and lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, so it provides some extra features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a sharper display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a way higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Moto G9 Power has just a bit more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Power has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a lot better resolution back camera.
Moto G9 Power features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.