Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's score of 76.4. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but they have the same thickness. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixels density.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more cpu cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.