Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| $ 603.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a global score of 92.3 against 77.4. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs, higher video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with greater battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.