Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is a lot newer than Moto Z2 Play's, but it's incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a larger display and a little greater pixels density. Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with faster video frame rates.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z2 Play, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.