Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer phone than the Moto Z3, although it is just a little bit thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto Z3, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution, a bit better pixels amount in each inch of screen and a little bit larger display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better low light images, faster 60 fps video frame rates and a larger camera sensor.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than Moto Z3, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.