Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than Motorola One 5G, getting a 92.3 score against 84.6. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Motorola One 5G, even when they were released with only a few months difference. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little sharper screen than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola One 5G features a better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola One 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola One 5G has a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than Motorola One 5G, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.