Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little faster CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit higher display density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better memory for applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than Motorola One 5G Ace, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.