Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide identical operating system features. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than Motorola One Hyper, even when they were released only 8 months apart.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a little bit larger display, a quite higher screen pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Motorola One Hyper shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and videos in low light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
Motorola One Hyper features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper features superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.