Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola One Vision's overall score of 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer and thinner than the Motorola One Vision's, although it is also just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola One Vision has just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a larger aperture, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Motorola One Vision counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.