Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than the Motorola One Zoom's 80 general score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer phone, and it is also a little bit lighter and thinner than Motorola One Zoom. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little greater pixels number per display inch. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola One Zoom shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Motorola One Zoom counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs more than Motorola One Zoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.