Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit better than Motorola razr (2020), having a 92.3 score against 87. Even when Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Motorola razr (2020) were only released 2 months apart, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should give identical OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola razr (2020). Both have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite bigger screen, a better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a just a bit greater pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, both have the same 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures, a lot more MP camera and a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.