Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 score. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot older than the Motorola razr (2022), it's construction is just a little lighter and a bit thinner.
Motorola razr (2022) features a processor that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's CPU, both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola razr (2022) shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.