Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 425 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 global score. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a camera with way more MP and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.