Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW's 80.3 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Nokia 8 V 5G UW were released only 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10, so it provides you some additional features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a much higher resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.