Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is way better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer and just a bit thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the Nokia 9 PureView. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better performance than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nokia 9 PureView has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a battery life that is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although the Nokia 9 PureView also has a 3320mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.