Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Nokia XR20, having a 92.3 score against 80.8. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is notably lighter and a lot thinner than Nokia XR20, although it was released about a year before.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Nokia XR20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Nokia XR20 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a display with the same size.
The Nokia XR20 takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Nokia XR20 features just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 40 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit more expensive than the Nokia XR20, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.