Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a 92.3 score against 75.8. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer, somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little bit better pixels count per screen inch. The nubia Red Magic 3S's CPU is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has 4 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and nubia Red Magic 3S have quite similar storage for games and applications, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a much higher video resolution and a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a bit more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.