Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with a overall score of 92.3 against 76.2. Even when Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the nubia Red Magic 5S were only released 1 months apart, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little faster CPU than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little worse display pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a same size screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much higher video definition, a much better resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a little more than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.