Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Ocean |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the OPPO Find X2, having a 92.3 score against 79.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and OPPO Find X2 were only released 3 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Find X2 has a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a just a little greater display density.
OPPO Find X2 features as much memory for games and applications as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 features a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Find X2 has improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.