Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is just a little heavier but just a bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Neo, and they were released only 3 months apart. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite smaller display, a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much more MP back camera.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G and OPPO Find X2 Neo count with really similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 22% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.