Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Ocean |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is somewhat thinner and lighter than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when both were only released 3 months apart. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a bit higher screen density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.