Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is way better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 overall score. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even when the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and OPPO Find X3 Neo were released with only a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little lighter and a little thinner.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit lower display density, a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400. OPPO Find X3 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G count with very similar storage to store more games and applications, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. OPPO Find X3 Neo captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a much better 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.