Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Galaxy A13 5G, getting a 92.3 score against 82.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Galaxy A13 5G, although it was released about a year before. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a way higher quantity of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy A13 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.