Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 overall score. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is noticeably older than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, it's body is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a lot better processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A15 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy A15 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A15 5G, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.