Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy A21s, having a overall score of 92.3 against 77.7. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A21s, although they were only released with a couple months difference. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A21s has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A21s, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a way better count of pixels per screen inch and a bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A21s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A21s counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A21s counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.