Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Galaxy A30, with a overall score of 92.3 against 79.6. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is newer and just a little thinner, but a little bit heavier than Galaxy A30. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a quite bigger display, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a way worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.