Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Galaxy A35 5G feature incredibly similar screens, although the Galaxy A35 5G has a just a bit worse pixel quantity per inch in the display, a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a much larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.