Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Galaxy A41, getting a 92.3 score against 81.7. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is just a little thinner but heavier than Galaxy A41, and both of them were released with only a few months difference. Both devices we are comparing come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A41 has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy A41 captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.