Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than Galaxy A50's overall score of 83.8. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is newer and just a little thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A50. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a little larger display and a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a camera with a lot lower resolution and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A50 has a slightly better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A50, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.