Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A50s's global score of 86.6. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and increased performance. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy A50s's, although it's a little heavier.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a little bit higher screen pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A50s features just a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.