Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A52, with a global score of 92.3 against 90.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A52 were released only 7 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a bit larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A52 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy A52 features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 has improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.