Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A52s's 91.1 overall score. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A52s, even though it was released only 13 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52s features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Galaxy A52s has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.