Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), having a overall score of 92.3 against 75.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a notably newer phone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy A7 (2017). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger display, a little greater pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a larger aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A7 (2017) features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 9 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.