Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Galaxy A70, having a 92.3 score against 76.9. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body weights the same than the Galaxy A70, but it is a little thinner. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, offering a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a just a little greater pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 36 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than Galaxy A70, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.