Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 general score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction weights the same than Galaxy A9 (2018), but it is just a little thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite higher pixels count per screen inch, a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little faster processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.