Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-07 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy C7, having a 92.3 score against 77.7. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a incredibly newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy C7, but it's a bit thicker and a little heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a bit better pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy C7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy C7, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 has a battery performance that's very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.