Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F23, with a global score of 92.3 against 84.6. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy F23 has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy F23, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a quite larger screen and a bit greater pixels number in each display inch.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F23, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy F23 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.