Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy F41, having a global score of 92.3 against 85.2. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS. Even when the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Galaxy F41 were released with only 2 months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a little bit lighter and thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite smaller display, a bit worse screen density and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy F41 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy F41 features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has an 82 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.