Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62, having a global score of 92.3 against 88.1. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is incredibly thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy F62, even when both were released only 7 months apart. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide identical OS features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores. Galaxy F62 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little lower count of pixels per inch of screen, they both have a same size display.
The Galaxy F62 shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy F62 has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.