Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G's general score of 92.3. The Galaxy Fold design is just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, but it's extremely heavier and was released around 11 months before. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy Z Flip 5G has Android 11.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Fold counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 33% more battery size. The Galaxy Fold has a camera that is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 5G's camera, and although the Galaxy Fold has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video, they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video definition.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G. If you want to save some money, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 5G, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.