Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Galaxy M20, having a global score of 92.3 against 78.9. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple additional features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is newer, just a bit lighter and thinner than Galaxy M20.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior processor than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.