Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy M30's global score of 82.4. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy M30's, although it is also a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a little bigger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a little higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M30 has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a less MP back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture for better photography in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.