Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit better than Galaxy M51, with a score of 92.3 against 87.7. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version while Galaxy M51 has Android 10 version, counting with some additional features and optimized performance. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Galaxy M51 were released with only 1 months difference, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat lighter and notably thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better display than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little greater pixel density. Galaxy M51 features just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy M51 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way larger sensor and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 112% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.