Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 20, with a general score of 92.3 against 90.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy Note 20, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 20. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a little greater display pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution camera in the back and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a lot higher video resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 features superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 30% more battery size.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.