Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a notably newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's also just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.