Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note10, getting a 92.3 score against 89. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer and just a little thinner than Galaxy Note10's, but it is also a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little bit greater screen pixel density, a little bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution.
Galaxy Note10's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 5G's one, both have equal internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10. Both have a 8 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. Galaxy Note10 counts with a camera that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, and although the Galaxy Note10 has a larger camera aperture, they both have the same video frame rate, a 0.39 inches sensor, a 12 MP back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.